From TM-EX Newsletter, Spring 1991 IOWA MIU RESEARCH UPDATE As the methodology of MIU researchers has improved, some of their studies report observations that challenge the validity of the TM movement's doctrinal stance; for example, a Ph.D. thesis (D, MIU, 1989, T735.494, in the MIU library) called The Transcendental Meditation technique: A new direction for smoking cessation programs. In this study, 60 percent of smokers who began TM and were still practicing TM twice daily after 20 months, quit smoking. TM may help someone to quit smoking if the individual stays with the practice for 20 months (great!). Data also revealed that 20 months after 505 individuals began TM, 29.7 percent were no longer meditating, 38.2 percent were occasional practitioners, 13.3 percent practiced TM once a day, and only 18.8 percent still practiced TM twice daily as instructed. Some people have long suspected that it is inaccurate for the TM movement to base assertions regarding the number of people who practice TM on the numbers of people who have been instructed. Now there is hard data in the MIU library that confirms this suspicion--in the MIU library--until this newsletter is published, that is, because the MIU administration does have a practice of removing books not supportive of doctrinal claims made by the TM organization, as was observed and verified by Albert Miller in 1989. A second example, a paper by Drs. John Kesterson and Noah Clinch, which was published in the March 1989 edition of the American Journal of Physiology (p. R632) reports on the most in-depth study to date on the effects of TM on respiration (breathing) and metabolic rate (level of rest). Even using longterm meditators as subjects, including Purusha [full time male staff] members, the authors had to conclude that TM resulted in no greater level of rest than was observed in controls who sat with their eyes closed. Kesterson and Clinch also state in their paper that TMers reached the deepest levels of rest while lying down after TM, not while practicing TM. Maharishi's teaching is at odds with these findings. In Maharishi's teachings, enlightenment, from a physiological perspective, is said to be gained by release of stress and normalization of the nervous system due to deep rest in TM; the rest is said to be unique and deeper than sleep at night. If TM doesn't provide any more rest than sitting with eyes closed, what's the new explanation for how it produces enlightenment on a physiological level? There isn't one. TM administrators haven't had to provide a new understanding: Instead they suppressed the findings of Kesterson and Clinch's study through selective inattention. These two MIU researchers did find a physiological indicator of TM, but it is not one that a TM person would expect. In their subjects practicing TM, but not in control subjects, they observed a slight decrease in respiratory exchange ration, which indicates a probable increased retention of carbon dioxide (usually considered to be a waste product) by subjects during TM.~